From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bridget C. v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, D. Connecticut
Mar 2, 2022
3:20-CV-1740 (SRU)(SDV) (D. Conn. Mar. 2, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-CV-1740 (SRU)(SDV)

03-02-2022

BRIDGET C., Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF Social Security, [1] Defendant.


ORDER

Stefan R. Underhill United States District Judge

On review and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72.2 of the Local Rules for United States Magistrate Judges (D. Conn.), and in consideration of the fact that no objections were filed and the time in which to do so has passed, the recommended ruling granting plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (doc. # 21) and denying defendant's Motion for an Order Affirming the Decision of the Commissioner (doc. #29) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety. The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the recommended ruling (doc. #33).

The clerk is instructed to close the file.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Bridget C. v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, D. Connecticut
Mar 2, 2022
3:20-CV-1740 (SRU)(SDV) (D. Conn. Mar. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Bridget C. v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:BRIDGET C., Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Connecticut

Date published: Mar 2, 2022

Citations

3:20-CV-1740 (SRU)(SDV) (D. Conn. Mar. 2, 2022)