From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bridges v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jan 18, 1934
228 Ala. 72 (Ala. 1934)

Opinion

6 Div. 465.

November 2, 1933 Rehearing Denied January 18, 1934.

Crampton Harris, Albert Boutwell, and Fort, Beddow Ray, all of Birmingham, for petitioner.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.


Petition of R. A. Bridges for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Bridges v. State, 152 So. 51.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

On Rehearing.


We have again carefully reconsidered all the contentions made by petitioner for error in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, and still think that it correctly disposed of all questions there treated, and the discussion respecting them, except we think that charge 41 is covered by charge 40, reference to which is made by petitioner, and was refused without error for that reason rather than on the ground that it is argumentative.

Application for rehearing overruled.

ANDERSON, C. J., GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bridges v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jan 18, 1934
228 Ala. 72 (Ala. 1934)
Case details for

Bridges v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRIDGES v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jan 18, 1934

Citations

228 Ala. 72 (Ala. 1934)
152 So. 54

Citing Cases

State v. Rawls

This general rule is repeated in varying forms in many cases and most of the works on evidence. United States…

Sanders v. State

"Answering your inquiry of January 5, 1954, propounded to this court under authority of Section 88, Title 13,…