From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bridges v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 11, 2007
No. CIV S-03-2338 RRB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2007)

Summary

finding interval of seventy-six days constituted unreasonable delay in light of Chavis

Summary of this case from Gentry v. Haviland

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-2338 RRB KJM P.

September 11, 2007


ORDER


On March 7, 2007, the Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District transmitted transcripts of three Marsden proceedings held before the Shasta County Superior Court, one on July 6, 2000, one on November 7, 2000, and one on January 12, 2001, under seal, to this court.

The January 12, 2001 transcript is misidentified on the cover sheet as related to proceedings on November 7, 2000.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to file the Shasta County Superior Court transcripts dated July 6, 2000, November 7, 2000, and January 12, 2001, under seal.


Summaries of

Bridges v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 11, 2007
No. CIV S-03-2338 RRB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2007)

finding interval of seventy-six days constituted unreasonable delay in light of Chavis

Summary of this case from Gentry v. Haviland

finding 76-day delay unreasonable

Summary of this case from Diaz v. Campbell

finding 76-day delay unreasonable

Summary of this case from Muhammad v. Adams

finding unjustified 76-day delay unreasonable

Summary of this case from WU v. CURRY
Case details for

Bridges v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:MONTE LEE BRIDGES, Petitioner, v. D.L. RUNNELS, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 11, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-03-2338 RRB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2007)

Citing Cases

WU v. CURRY

e, the length of the delay at issue is 93 days. Although the Ninth Circuit has not addressed the…

Sok v. Substance Abuse Training Facility

Compare Culver v. Director of Corrections, 450 F.Supp.2d 1135, 1140-1141 (C.D. Cal. 2006)(delays of 97 and 71…