From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bridges v. Hubbard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 29, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-0940 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-0940 GEB DAD P

04-29-2013

WILLIE BRIDGES, Plaintiff, v. SUZAN L. HUBBARD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a motion for reconsideration of the undersigned's order requiring him to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment within twenty-one days. Plaintiff contends that he never received a copy of defendants' motion. In the interest of justice, the court will direct the Clerk of the Court to send plaintiff a courtesy copy of defendants' motion for summary judgment. The court will also grant plaintiff an additional twenty-one days to file his opposition to the motion.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 108) is granted;

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a courtesy copy of defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 91-93); and

3. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment within twenty-one days. Defendants shall file a reply, if any, in accordance with Local Rule 230(l).

________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Bridges v. Hubbard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 29, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-0940 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Bridges v. Hubbard

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE BRIDGES, Plaintiff, v. SUZAN L. HUBBARD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 29, 2013

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-0940 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2013)