Bridgeman v. Copas

Full title: Wiley Bridgeman, Plaintiff v. Correctional Officer Copas, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Oct 6, 2009

Case No. 1:07-cv-895 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 6, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 1:07-cv-895.

October 6, 2009

ORDER

SANDRA BECKWITH, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed September 15, 2009 (Doc. 63).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff's amended complaint is DISMISSED.

This Court certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore DENIES plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See McGore v Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6^th Cir. 1997).