From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bridgeford v. Pazin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-00800-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-00800-DLB PC

02-11-2013

BRYAN DAVID BRIDGEFORD, Plaintiff, v. MARK PAZIN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE


RESPONSE DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

Plaintiff Bryan David Bridgeford ("Plaintiff") is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 8, 2012, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's first amended complaint for failure to state a claim with leave to amend, and ordered Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint within thirty days. ECF No. 8. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not responded.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to show cause within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order and failure to state a claim. Failure to timely respond or otherwise show cause will result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order and failure to state a claim. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Bridgeford v. Pazin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-00800-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Bridgeford v. Pazin

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN DAVID BRIDGEFORD, Plaintiff, v. MARK PAZIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 11, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:12-cv-00800-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)