Opinion
Argued March 16, 1887
Decided April 19, 1887
William C. Holbrook for appellant.
Joseph H. Choate for respondent.
FINCH, J., reads for affirmance, with costs.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Bridge v. Penniman
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 19, 1887
12 N.E. 19 (N.Y. 1887)
Summaries of
Bridge v. Penniman
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 19, 1887
12 N.E. 19 (N.Y. 1887)
Case details for
Bridge v. Penniman
Case Details
Full title:WILLIAM F. BRIDGE, Appellant, v . GEORGE H. PENNIMAN, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 19, 1887
Citations
12 N.E. 19 (N.Y. 1887)
105 N.Y. 642
8 N.Y. St. Rptr. 187
Citing Cases
Tichnor Brothers, Inc., v. Barley
This did not constitute a valid tender. Howard v. Hayes, 40 N.Y. Super. Ct. 89; affd., without opinion, 90…
Farnsworth v. Duffnero be fraudulent, so as to work a rescission of the contract of sale. It is no ground for rescinding such a…