From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brian S. v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Feb 25, 2021
Civil Action No.: 3:20cv65 (E.D. Va. Feb. 25, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 3:20cv65

02-25-2021

BRIAN S., Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


FINAL ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered on February 10, 2021. (ECF No. 19.) The time to file objections has expired and neither party has objected to the Report and Recommendation. Having considered the matter and deeming it otherwise proper and just to do so, it is hereby ORDERED:

(1) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (ECF No. 19), is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the OPINION of the Court.

(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 13), is DENIED.

(3) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 15), is GRANTED.

(4) The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

(5) This case is CLOSED.

Let the Clerk of the Court send a copy of this Final Order to all counsel of record.

It is so ORDERED.

/s/_________

John A. Gibney, Jr.

United States District Judge Date: 25 February 2021
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Brian S. v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Feb 25, 2021
Civil Action No.: 3:20cv65 (E.D. Va. Feb. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Brian S. v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN S., Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Feb 25, 2021

Citations

Civil Action No.: 3:20cv65 (E.D. Va. Feb. 25, 2021)

Citing Cases

Yohannes M. v. Kijakazi

. 3:20CV065 (JAG), 2021 WL 748087, at *13 (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 2021) (alteration in original) (quoting Prim v.…

Willis L. v. Kijakazi

“Indeed, the ‘ALJ is not required to accept the vocational expert's opinion for a hypothetical based on…