Opinion
No. 05-08-00140-CR
Opinion issued January 30, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F00-45394-PK.
Before Justices MORRIS, FRANCIS, and MURPHY. Opinion By Justice FRANCIS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Vernell Brewer, Jr. appeals from his conviction for possession with intent to deliver cocaine in an amount of four grams or more, but less than 200 grams. After adjudicating appellant's guilt, the trial court assessed punishment at fifteen years in prison. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment adjudicating guilt.