From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brenner v. de Bruin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1991
171 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

March 25, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Namm, J.).


Ordered that the case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for compliance with CPLR 4213 (b), and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court shall file its findings of fact with this court with all convenient speed.

CPLR 4213 (b) requires that a trial court state the facts it deems essential to its determination. In this case, the Supreme Court, after a nonjury trial, granted judgment in favor of the defendant dismissing the complaint without stating the reasons therefor. Thus, the Supreme Court failed to comply with the requirements of CPLR 4213 (b). Under these circumstances, intelligent judicial review of the judgment is impossible at this time (see, De Ibero v De Ibero, 33 A.D.2d 804; Alleyne v Alleyne, 46 A.D.2d 785; Ken Wire Metal Prods. v Vogel's Inc., 69 A.D.2d 898). Brown, J.P., Sullivan, Eiber and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brenner v. de Bruin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1991
171 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Brenner v. de Bruin

Case Details

Full title:ALAN BRENNER, Appellant, v. G. DAVID DE BRUIN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1991

Citations

171 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
567 N.Y.S.2d 769

Citing Cases

YAN GE v. POLANCO

The trial court failed to comply with CPLR 4213(b) in rendering the judgment in defendant's favor without…

Quinones v. Diaz

The trial court failed to comply with CPLR 4213(b) in rendering the judgment in plaintiff's favor without…