From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brenner v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Apr 13, 2022
No. 16892-21S (U.S.T.C. Apr. 13, 2022)

Opinion

16892-21S

04-13-2022

PHYLLIS A. BRENNER, INCOMPETENT, CAROL S. HILL, NEXT FRIEND, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge

On December 20, 2021, Carol S. Hill filed a Motion To Be Recognized as Next Friend.

Rule 60(d) of the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure provides that an incompetent person who does not have a duly appointed representative may prosecute a case in this Court through a next friend. See Campos v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-193. The Court is satisfied that petitioner is unable to represent herself in this case and that Carol S. Hill should be recognized as petitioner's next friend.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that Carol S. Hill's Motion To Be Recognized as Next Friend is granted and Carol S. Hill is recognized as next friend of petitioner for purposes of the present proceeding. It is further

ORDERED that the caption of this case is amended to read "Phyllis A. Brenner, Carol S. Hill, Next Friend, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent".


Summaries of

Brenner v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Apr 13, 2022
No. 16892-21S (U.S.T.C. Apr. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Brenner v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:PHYLLIS A. BRENNER, INCOMPETENT, CAROL S. HILL, NEXT FRIEND, Petitioner v…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Apr 13, 2022

Citations

No. 16892-21S (U.S.T.C. Apr. 13, 2022)