Brendaz Ta v. Merck & Co.

Full title: BRENDAZ TA, an individual, Plaintiff, v. MERCK & CO., INC., a New Jersey…

Court: United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 13, 2024

8:22-cv-00825-DMG (MAAx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2024)

Opinion

8:22-cv-00825-DMG (MAAx)

03-13-2024

BRENDAZ TA, an individual, Plaintiff, v. MERCK & CO., INC., a New Jersey Corporation; MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. a New Jersey Corporation; ORGANON & CO., a Delaware Corporation; ORGANON LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, Defendants.

Kevin P. Roddy, CA State Bar No. 128283 WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A. BECK LAW CENTER Shehnaz M. Bhujwala, CA State Bar No. 223484 BOUCHER LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Kevin P. Roddy, CA State Bar No. 128283

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A.

BECK LAW CENTER

Shehnaz M. Bhujwala, CA State Bar No. 223484

BOUCHER LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL CLAIMS ASSERTED BY PLAINTIFF BRENDAZ TA PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF PROCEDURE 41 [79]

DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Based on the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to dismiss this matter with prejudice. All other existing dates and deadlines in this matter are hereby vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.