From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bremus v. AMR Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 16, 2015
604 F. App'x 324 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-2301

06-16-2015

ANNE MELCHOR BREMUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMR CORPORATION; AMERICAN AIRLINES, INCORPORATED; AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees.

John B. Mann, JOHN B. MANN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Daniel E. Farrington, THE FARRINGTON LAW FIRM, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:12-cv-00100-RBS-LRL) Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John B. Mann, JOHN B. MANN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Daniel E. Farrington, THE FARRINGTON LAW FIRM, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anne Melchor Bremus appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings on Bremus's discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). Bremus has filed a motion for leave to file materials as an attachment to her opening brief, and Defendants have filed a motion for leave to file a supplemental appendix. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant the parties' pending motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bremus v. AMR Corp., No. 2:12-cv-00100-RBS-LRL (E.D. Va. Nov. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Bremus v. AMR Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 16, 2015
604 F. App'x 324 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Bremus v. AMR Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ANNE MELCHOR BREMUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMR CORPORATION; AMERICAN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 16, 2015

Citations

604 F. App'x 324 (4th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

In re Swain

"The purpose of a discharge in bankruptcy is to 'give[ ] the debtor a "fresh start" by releasing him, her, or…

Harmon v. Harmon

. In deciding the motion, the Court “may consider the complaint, answers, matters of public record, exhibits…