From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Breitman v. Dennett, M.D

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 19, 2010
77 A.D.3d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 3374.

October 19, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered December 21, 2009, which, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Belair Evans LLP, New York (James B. Reich of counsel), for appellant.

Gerald J. Mondora, Rye Brook, for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Acosta, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.


Defendant dermatologist failed to establish his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action alleging medical malpractice. Defendant submitted an affidavit which stated that during his treatment of plaintiff, he did not deviate from good and accepted medical practices. However, it failed to address plaintiffs essential factual allegations, namely, whether the keloid defendant treated was or was not the same lesion that proved to be cancerous ( see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853; Kotler v Swersky, 10 AD3d 350).


Summaries of

Breitman v. Dennett, M.D

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 19, 2010
77 A.D.3d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Breitman v. Dennett, M.D

Case Details

Full title:RACHEL BREITMAN, Respondent, v. JAY A. DENNETT, M.D., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 19, 2010

Citations

77 A.D.3d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7402
910 N.Y.S.2d 51

Citing Cases

Estate of Martinez v. 977 Grant Towers LLC

977 Grant cannot use the lack of a power cord to its benefit, as a defendant cannot carry their initial…

Chapman v. City of N.Y.

Plaintiff's notice of claim and complaint, as amplified by her bill of particulars, made clear that she was…