From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Breeland v. Pennsylvania

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7691 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7691

04-20-2012

JOSEPH BREELAND, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LEHIGH COUNTY, Respondents.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of the pleadings and the record in this case, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter dated March 27, 2012, no objections having been filed, IT IS

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Thomas J. Rueter dated March 27, 2012, is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by Joseph Breeland is DENIED; and,
3. A certificate of appealability WILL NOT ISSUE for any of petitioner's claims because reasonable jurists would not debate whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right as required under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

BY THE COURT:

_________________

JAN E. DUBOIS, J.


Summaries of

Breeland v. Pennsylvania

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7691 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Breeland v. Pennsylvania

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH BREELAND, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA THE ATTORNEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 20, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7691 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 2012)

Citing Cases

Suarez v. Pennsylvania

See (Docs. 13-2, 13-3, 13-4, 13-5 at ¶¶ 9, 12-14). See also Breeland v. Commonwealth, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS…