From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Breckenridge v. Turner

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 28, 2008
Case No. 2:07-cv-988 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 28, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 2:07-cv-988.

August 28, 2008


ORDER


On August 6, 2008, Magistrate Judge King issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted because Plaintiff had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996. (Doc. 33, 41). The parties were specifically advised that they had 10 days to file and serve objections to that Report and Recommendation, and that failure to object would result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation.

Plaintiff Jason Breckenridge received a copy of the Report and Recommendation by certified mail on August 13, 2008. Nevertheless, he has failed to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation within the time allotted. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge King's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 41) and GRANTS Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 33). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Breckenridge v. Turner

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 28, 2008
Case No. 2:07-cv-988 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Breckenridge v. Turner

Case Details

Full title:JASON BENJAMIN BRECKENRIDGE, Plaintiff, v. ADRIAN TURNER, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 28, 2008

Citations

Case No. 2:07-cv-988 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 28, 2008)

Citing Cases

Kendrick v. Erdos

To extent that he disagrees with the legal determinations made by the Court in this case regarding the…