Breckenridge v. Lappin

Full title: WILMER KEITH BRECKENRIDGE, Plaintiff, v. HARVEY LAPPIN, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Oct 21, 2010

CV 08-734-CL (D. Or. Oct. 21, 2010)

Opinion

CV 08-734-CL.

October 21, 2010

ORDER

OWEN PANNER, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been timely filed, this court reviews legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#85) is adopted. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (#66) is granted and this action is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 21 day of October, 2010.