From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brazilia, L.L.C. v. Renfrow

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec 13, 2011
354 S.W.3d 255 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. ED 96146.

2011-12-13

BRAZILIA, L.L.C., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Catie RENFROW, Defendant/Appellant,andJames Boice, Defendant.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Sandra Farragut–Hemphill, Judge.Thomas R. Carnes, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. William F. Whealen, Jr., Stephen J. Barber, Miller and Steeno, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Sandra Farragut–Hemphill, Judge.Thomas R. Carnes, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. William F. Whealen, Jr., Stephen J. Barber, Miller and Steeno, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Catie Renfrow, appeals from the judgment denying her motion seeking relief from a default judgment entered against her on February 5, 2007, in a rent and possession action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Brazilia, L.L.C. v. Renfrow

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec 13, 2011
354 S.W.3d 255 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Brazilia, L.L.C. v. Renfrow

Case Details

Full title:BRAZILIA, L.L.C., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Catie RENFROW…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Date published: Dec 13, 2011

Citations

354 S.W.3d 255 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)