From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brazell v. Ruh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
May 21, 2015
Case No. 5:14-cv-00238-KGB-JJV (E.D. Ark. May. 21, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 5:14-cv-00238-KGB-JJV

05-21-2015

MICHAEL BRAZELL, Jr. ADC #500711 PLAINTIFF v. A. RUH, Lieutenant, Maximum Security Unit; et al. DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

SO ADJUDGED this the 21st day of May, 2015.

/s/_________

KRISTINE G. BAKER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brazell v. Ruh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
May 21, 2015
Case No. 5:14-cv-00238-KGB-JJV (E.D. Ark. May. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Brazell v. Ruh

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BRAZELL, Jr. ADC #500711 PLAINTIFF v. A. RUH, Lieutenant, Maximum…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: May 21, 2015

Citations

Case No. 5:14-cv-00238-KGB-JJV (E.D. Ark. May. 21, 2015)

Citing Cases

Alex A. v. Edwards

See, i.e., Brown v. Eardley, 184 Fed.Appx. 689, 69192 (10th Cir. 2006) (holding administrative remedies were…