From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bray v. LeBlanc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SEC. P
Feb 29, 2012
DOCKET NO. 10-0586 (W.D. La. Feb. 29, 2012)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. 10-0586

02-29-2012

TOMMY BRAY v. JAMES LeBLANC, ET AL


JUDGE James T. Trimble, Jr.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES D. KIRK


JUDGMENT

There being no objection to the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge previously filed herein, the Court concludes that the proposed findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law.

Additionally, the Court notes the copy of the report and recommendation mailed December 16, 2011 to Mr. Bray's last known address was returned to the Clerk of Court on December 30, 2011, marked "moved from AVC". More than thirty days have passed since December 30, 2011, but no correction to Plaintiff's address has been received by the Court. Therefore, dismissal for failure to prosecute under Local Rule 41.3W and Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is also appropriate. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SIGNED on this 29th day of February, 2012, at Alexandria, Louisiana.

______________

James T. Trimble, Jr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bray v. LeBlanc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SEC. P
Feb 29, 2012
DOCKET NO. 10-0586 (W.D. La. Feb. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Bray v. LeBlanc

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY BRAY v. JAMES LeBLANC, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SEC. P

Date published: Feb 29, 2012

Citations

DOCKET NO. 10-0586 (W.D. La. Feb. 29, 2012)