From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braxton v. Lott

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
Jun 6, 2022
C/A 3:21-3649-JFA-SVH (D.S.C. Jun. 6, 2022)

Opinion

C/A 3:21-3649-JFA-SVH

06-06-2022

Bryant Braxton, Plaintiff, v. Leon Lott; Mike Wenzell; Jason Cuzzupe; and D. McRoberts, Defendants.


ORDER

Shiva V. Hodges United States Magistrate Judge

This matter comes before the court on the motion [ECF No. 17] of Bryant Braxton (“Plaintiff') to compel Leon Lott, Mike Wenzell, Jason Cuzzupe, and D. McRoberts (“Defendants”) to produce responses to Plaintiffs Interrogatories and Requests for Production (“Discovery Requests”), which are attached to Plaintiffs motion at ECF No. 17-1 and 17-2.

The motion indicates the Discovery Requests were first served on Plaintiff on November 12, 2021. After granting Defendants extensions to respond to the Discovery Requests, Plaintiff had not received written responses by May 27, 2022, the date Plaintiff filed his motion to compel.

In light of the foregoing, the court grants Plaintiffs motion to compel. Defendants are directed to provide responses to the Discovery Requests by June 20, 2022. Because Defendants failed to timely respond to the Discovery Requests, any and all objections are deemed waived under Fed.R.Civ.P. 33(b)(4). Defendants are advised that failure to comply with the court's order may result in sanctions, including payment of Plaintiff's attorneys' fees and costs in preparing such motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Braxton v. Lott

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
Jun 6, 2022
C/A 3:21-3649-JFA-SVH (D.S.C. Jun. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Braxton v. Lott

Case Details

Full title:Bryant Braxton, Plaintiff, v. Leon Lott; Mike Wenzell; Jason Cuzzupe; and…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division

Date published: Jun 6, 2022

Citations

C/A 3:21-3649-JFA-SVH (D.S.C. Jun. 6, 2022)