From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braxton v. Jennings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 2009
63 A.D.3d 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-06725.

June 9, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated May 27, 2008, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Richard T. Lau, Jericho, N.Y. (Keith E. Ford of counsel), for appellant.

Harmon, Linder Rogowsky, New York, N.Y. (Mitchell Dranow of counsel), for respondent.

Spolzino, J.P., Angiolillo, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

Regardless of whether we accept the plaintiff's or the defendant's version of the subject accident, the defendant established, prima facie, that she did not contribute to the accident and that the sole proximate cause of the accident was the conduct of the infant plaintiff, who suddenly stepped into the road when it was not safe for him to do so ( see 34 RCNY 4-04 [b] [2]; cf. Ryan v Budget Rent a Car, 37 AD3d 698; Deitz v Huibregtse, 25 AD3d 645; Ruocco v Mulhall, 281 AD2d 406). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.


Summaries of

Braxton v. Jennings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 2009
63 A.D.3d 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Braxton v. Jennings

Case Details

Full title:JARIUS BRAXTON, Respondent, v. BARBARA JENNINGS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 2009

Citations

63 A.D.3d 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 4848
880 N.Y.S.2d 516

Citing Cases

Boereau v. Scott

Here, the defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by…

Shimonova v. Santaella

Furthermore, the police report attributes "pedestrian error" as the cause of the subject accident. Under the…