From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braunstein v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 8, 2013
No. 62547 (Nev. Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. 62547

03-08-2013

STEVEN SAMUEL BRAUNSTEIN, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a proper person petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner seeks to reinstate his post-conviction habeas petition filed on December 16, 2010, because he claims that it was erroneously denied. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. Accordingly, we

The district court denied the petition, and this court affirmed the order on appeal. See Braunstein v. State, Docket No. 58136 (Order of Affirmance, September 14, 2011).

ORDER the petition DENIED.

_________, C.J.

Pickering
______, J.
Gibbons
______, J.
Douglas
cc: Steven Samuel Braunstein

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney


Summaries of

Braunstein v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 8, 2013
No. 62547 (Nev. Mar. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Braunstein v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN SAMUEL BRAUNSTEIN, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Citations

No. 62547 (Nev. Mar. 8, 2013)