From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brauninger v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 22, 2018
Case No. 1:16-cv-926 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 22, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 1:16-cv-926

03-22-2018

LISA BRAUNINGER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECUARITY, Defendant.


Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 13), OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS (Doc. 14), AND TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court, and, on November 3, 2017, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 13). Plaintiff timely filed objections. ("Objections," Doc. 14). Defendant filed a response to the Objections. (Doc. 15).

Plaintiff's Objections are not well-taken. First, the Objections restate Plaintiff's argument that the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") erred in determining that Plaintiff's low back condition did not meet or equal the requirements of Listing 1.04(A). (Doc. 14 at 2-6). The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that the ALJ's determination that Plaintiff does not have an impairment that meets or equals Listing 1.04(A) is supported by substantial evidence. (See Doc. 13 at 6-15). Second, the Objections restate Plaintiff's argument that the ALJ improperly weighed evidence in formulating Plaintiff's residual functioning capacity. (Doc. 14 at 6-9). The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that the ALJ properly determined that the testimony of Plaintiff's treating physicians that Plaintiff would need to lie down periodically during the day was not "well supported" by the record, and accordingly, the ALJ did not err in refusing to give such testimony controlling weight. (Doc. 14 at 16-24; see also Doc. 8-1 at 28-36). --------

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc 13) is ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiff's Objection (Doc. 14) is OVERRULED;

3. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED; and

4. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 3/22/18

/s/_________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brauninger v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 22, 2018
Case No. 1:16-cv-926 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 22, 2018)
Case details for

Brauninger v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:LISA BRAUNINGER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECUARITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 22, 2018

Citations

Case No. 1:16-cv-926 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 22, 2018)

Citing Cases

Starkey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

; Brauninger v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 1:16-CV-926, 2017 WL 5020137, at *4 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 3, 2017), report…

Jennifer L. S. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Nov. 3, 2017), report and recommendation adopted, No. 1:16-CV-926, 2018 WL 1420573 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 22,…