From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brauning v. Brooks

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Sep 5, 2023
No. CIV-23-598-J (W.D. Okla. Sep. 5, 2023)

Opinion

CIV-23-598-J

09-05-2023

JACOB WAYNE BRAUNING, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL BROOKS, Respondent.


ORDER

BERNARD M. JONES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner, an inmate at the Seminole County Jail, filed a petition seeking habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. [Doc. No. 1]. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell for initial proceedings consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), (C). [Doc. No. 3]. On July 31, 2023, Judge Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Petitioner's § 2241 habeas petition be dismissed without prejudice. [Doc. No. 4]. Petitioner was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by August 21, 2023. Petitioner has filed no objection and has therefore waived any right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues in the Report and Recommendation. See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 4] and DISMISSES Petitioner's § 2241 habeas petition [Doc. No. 1] without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brauning v. Brooks

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Sep 5, 2023
No. CIV-23-598-J (W.D. Okla. Sep. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Brauning v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:JACOB WAYNE BRAUNING, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL BROOKS, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 5, 2023

Citations

No. CIV-23-598-J (W.D. Okla. Sep. 5, 2023)