Braughton v. State

Full title: Christopher Ernest Braughton v. The State of Texas

Court: COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Aug 27, 2015

Cause number: 01-15-00393-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 27, 2015)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-15-00393-CR

08-27-2015

Christopher Ernest Braughton v. The State of Texas

Evelyn V. Keyes

ORDER ON MOTION

Type of motion: Motion to Substitute Counsel Party filing motion: Appellant's new counsel Niles Illich Document to be filed: N/A Is appeal accelerated? No. Ordered that motion is:

[v] Granted

[ ] Denied

[ ] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

[v] Other: __________

The motion to substitute counsel is granted, but construed as a notice of appearance as lead counsel, and the Clerk of this Court is directed to note Niles Illich as lead counsel for appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.1(a), 6.2, 6.5(d). If counsel Robert Sirianni requests withdrawal, he must file a motion that complies with Rule 6.5(d). Mr. Sirianni's objection is overruled as moot.

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

[×] Acting individually
Date: August 27, 2015 November 7, 2008 Revision