From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bratton v. Broomfield

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 14, 2023
20-cv-03885-BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2023)

Opinion

20-cv-03885-BLF (PR)

11-14-2023

RONALD W. BRATTON, Plaintiff, v. RON BROOMFIELD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1. On July 25, 2023, the Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss the second amended complaint but with leave to file a third amended complaint to correct the deficiencies discussed in the order. Dkt. No. 44. Plaintiff was directed to file a third amended complaint within twenty-eight days from the date the order was filed and advised that failure to respond would result in the dismissal of the action without further notice to Plaintiff. Id. at 17. Thereafter, the Court twice granted Plaintiff's motions of extensions of time with the same warning that failure to respond would result in dismissal of this action. Dkt. Nos. 46, 48.

The last deadline, October 30, 2023, has passed, and Plaintiff has failed to file a third amended complaint in the time provided. Dkt. No. 48 at 1. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to file a third amended complaint in the time provided.

The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bratton v. Broomfield

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 14, 2023
20-cv-03885-BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Bratton v. Broomfield

Case Details

Full title:RONALD W. BRATTON, Plaintiff, v. RON BROOMFIELD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Nov 14, 2023

Citations

20-cv-03885-BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2023)