From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bratcher v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 29, 2021
21 CIVIL 6510 (VB)(PED) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2021)

Opinion

21 CIVIL 6510 (VB)(PED)

09-29-2021

CLEO BRATCHER, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Stipulation and Order dated September 28, 2021, that this action be, and hereby is, reversed and remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. Remand is required pursuant to Carr v. Saul, 141 S.Ct. 1352 (2021), in which the Supreme Court held that a claimant need not raise an Appointments Clause claim before the Agency, but may instead present it for the first time in federal court. Here, Plaintiff has raised an Appointments Clause claim before this Court. Accordingly, on remand, the Appeals Council will assign Plaintiffs case to a different Administrative Law Judge to further evaluate Plaintiffs claims, offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing, and issue a new decision.


Summaries of

Bratcher v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 29, 2021
21 CIVIL 6510 (VB)(PED) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Bratcher v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:CLEO BRATCHER, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 29, 2021

Citations

21 CIVIL 6510 (VB)(PED) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2021)