From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braswell v. Wilson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1937
193 S.E. 20 (N.C. 1937)

Opinion

(Filed 13 October, 1937.)

Appeal and Error § 38 —

Where the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

APPEAL by defendant from Frizzelle, J., at June Term, 1937, of WILSON. Affirmed.

T. T. Thorne for plaintiff, appellee.

Finch, Rand Finch and W. A. Lucas for defendant, appellant.


This is an action by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant in which the defendant denied its negligence and entered the alternative plea of contributory negligence in bar of recovery. The issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and damage were answered in favor of the plaintiff and from judgment on the verdict the defendant appealed, assigning errors.


The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Barnhill, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision of this action without becoming a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N.C. 840; McMahan v. Basinger, 211 N.C. 747.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Braswell v. Wilson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1937
193 S.E. 20 (N.C. 1937)
Case details for

Braswell v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:ELLEN BRASWELL v. TOWN OF WILSON

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1937

Citations

193 S.E. 20 (N.C. 1937)
212 N.C. 833

Citing Cases

Piedmont Fire Insurance v. Stinson

The court being evenly divided in opinion, Seawell, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is…

Patterson v. Hosiery Mills

Devin, J., not sitting, and the remaining six members of the Court being equally divided in opinion as to…