From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brasloff v. Behrens

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 27, 2005
172 S.W.3d 475 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. ED 85855.

September 27, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Mark D. Seigel, Judge.

Natalia McKinstry, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Matthew J. Sauter, Sauter Sullivan Evans LLC; St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.


ORDER


Donald Brasloff (Plaintiff) appeals from the trial court's order and judgment granting Paul Behrens' (Defendant) Motion for Summary Judgment (summary judgment) as to Count IV and Count V of Plaintiff's petition in favor of Defendant and rendering all other pending motions moot. We affirm the trial court's judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Brasloff v. Behrens

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 27, 2005
172 S.W.3d 475 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Brasloff v. Behrens

Case Details

Full title:Donald BRASLOFF, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Paul BEHRENS, Defendant/Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Sep 27, 2005

Citations

172 S.W.3d 475 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)