From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brasil v. Brown

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 30, 2024
3:22-cv-03560-JD (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2024)

Opinion

3:22-cv-03560-JD

01-30-2024

RAQUEL BRASIL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GEORGE BROWN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

JAMES DONATO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On January 18, 2023, the Court held a regularly noted status conference in this case. Counsel for defendant Erik Brunner did not appear at the conference. Dkt. No. 53. The absence was unexcused. Brunner also did not participate in the joint statement required by the Court. Dkt. Nos. 50, 51. This was also unexcused.

These defaults unduly burden the Court and the other parties, and needlessly multiply the proceedings in this case. Brunner's counsel of record, David Banie, is directed to show cause in writing why the Court should not impose professional conduct sanctions on him, or monetary or other sanctions. A response to this order must be filed by February 16, 2024.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brasil v. Brown

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 30, 2024
3:22-cv-03560-JD (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Brasil v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:RAQUEL BRASIL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GEORGE BROWN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 30, 2024

Citations

3:22-cv-03560-JD (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2024)