From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brashear v. Foulk

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Feb 5, 2015
2:14-cv-2136-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2015)

Opinion


DEMETRIUS K. BRASHEAR, Petitioner, v. FOULK, et al., Respondents. No. 2:14-cv-2136-CMK-P United States District Court, E.D. California. February 5, 2015

          ORDER

          CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and no other party has been served or appeared in the action. Pending before the court is petitioner's motion for an extension of time (Doc. 8) to file a response to the court's November 19, 2014, order to show cause. Good cause appearing therefor, the request is granted. Petitioner shall file his response within 30 days of the date of this order.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brashear v. Foulk

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Feb 5, 2015
2:14-cv-2136-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2015)
Case details for

Brashear v. Foulk

Case Details

Full title:DEMETRIUS K. BRASHEAR, Petitioner, v. FOULK, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 5, 2015

Citations

2:14-cv-2136-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2015)