Brantley v. Marshall

Full title: NORMAN BRANTLEY, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: May 23, 2011

CV 08-6388-DMG (SH) (C.D. Cal. May. 23, 2011)

Opinion

NORMAN BRANTLEY, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 08-6388-DMG (SH) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. May 23, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Amended Report and Recommendation. The Court concurs with and adopts the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that the Petition filed herein is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Amended Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein by the United States mail on petitioner and counsel for respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.