From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brannon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug 28, 2012
375 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97868.

2012-08-28

Robert BRANNON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Steven R. Ohmer, Judge. Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Steven R. Ohmer, Judge.
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.Chris Koster, Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER



Robert Brannon (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Brannon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug 28, 2012
375 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Brannon v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert BRANNON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Aug 28, 2012

Citations

375 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Brannon v. Russell

On November 18, 2011, Petitioner's motion was denied without an evidentiary hearing (Id. at 39-42). On…