From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Branner v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 27, 2016
No. 69679 (Nev. App. Jul. 27, 2016)

Opinion

No. 69679

07-27-2016

TAURUS BRANNER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a motion to reconsider or modify sentence. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, Judge.

Appellant Taurus Branner claims the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion to reconsider or modify his sentence. In his motion, Branner alleged that his sentence was disproportionate to the sentences received by his two co-defendants in light of their conduct with respect to the victim. Branner's claim fell outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to modify sentence. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, without considering the merits of the claim raised in the motion, we conclude the district court did not err in denying the motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Tao /s/_________, J.
Silver cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge

Michael R. Pandullo

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Branner v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 27, 2016
No. 69679 (Nev. App. Jul. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Branner v. State

Case Details

Full title:TAURUS BRANNER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 27, 2016

Citations

No. 69679 (Nev. App. Jul. 27, 2016)