From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braiterman-Fedder Co. v. Cardilli

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Mar 19, 1929
145 A. 338 (Md. 1929)

Opinion

[No. 9, January Term, 1929.]

Decided March 19th, 1929.

Unfair Competition — Bill for Injunction.

A bill seeking to enjoin defendant from having manufactured for it, and selling, in competition with plaintiff, perforated music rolls, under its own trade mark, similar to those of plaintiff, and alleged to have been made from masters and matrices illegally procured from plaintiff, and so advertised as to induce the public to believe that they were plaintiff's products, held to be too indefinite in its allegations to entitle plaintiff to relief.

Decided March 19th, 1929.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (O'DUNNE, J.).

Bill by Mauro V. Cardilli against the Braiterman Fedder Company. From an order overruling a demurrer to the bill, defendant appeals. Reversed.

The cause was argued before BOND, C.J., URNER, OFFUTT, DIGGES, PARKE, and SLOAN, JJ.

Morris Fedder and W. Conwell Smith, for the appellant.

L.B. Keene Claggett, with whom were Bartlett, Poe Claggett on the brief, for the appellee.


Unreported cases.


Summaries of

Braiterman-Fedder Co. v. Cardilli

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Mar 19, 1929
145 A. 338 (Md. 1929)
Case details for

Braiterman-Fedder Co. v. Cardilli

Case Details

Full title:BRAITERMAN-FEDDER COMPANY v . MAURO V. CARDILLI

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Mar 19, 1929

Citations

145 A. 338 (Md. 1929)
145 A. 338

Citing Cases

World Gym Licensing, Ltd. v. Fitness World, Inc.

See Edmondson Village Theatre v. Einbinder, 208 Md. 38, 116 A.2d 377 (1955). From its Amended Complaint,…