From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brady v. Centaur Bldg. Servs., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three .
Feb 9, 2016
482 S.W.3d 450 (E.D. Mo. 2016)

Opinion

No. ED 102859

02-09-2016

Jada R. Brady, Appellant, v. Centaur Building Services, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.

John J. Ammann, St. Louis University Legal Clinic, 100 N. Tucker Blvd, Ste. 704, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant. Andrew C. Hooper, P.O. Box 59, Jefferson City, MO 65104, Centaur Building Services, Inc., Pro Se, 4401 Ridgewood Ave., St. Louis, MO 63112, for respondents.


John J. Ammann, St. Louis University Legal Clinic, 100 N. Tucker Blvd, Ste. 704, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Andrew C. Hooper, P.O. Box 59, Jefferson City, MO 65104, Centaur Building Services, Inc., Pro Se, 4401 Ridgewood Ave., St. Louis, MO 63112, for respondents.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The claimant, Jada Brady, appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission disqualifying her from receiving unemployment-compensation benefits because the employer, Centaur Building Services, Inc., discharged the claimant for misconduct connected with her work. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the decision of the Commission. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Brady v. Centaur Bldg. Servs., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three .
Feb 9, 2016
482 S.W.3d 450 (E.D. Mo. 2016)
Case details for

Brady v. Centaur Bldg. Servs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Jada R. Brady, Appellant, v. Centaur Building Services, Inc. and Division…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three .

Date published: Feb 9, 2016

Citations

482 S.W.3d 450 (E.D. Mo. 2016)