From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 16, 1942
19 S.E.2d 796 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942)

Opinion

29396.

DECIDED APRIL 16, 1942.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Humphries. October 9, 1941.

James R. Venable, Frank A. Bowers, for plaintiff in error.

Bond Almand, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, Durwood T. Pye, contra.


The defendant was convicted of operating a lottery, known as the "number game," for the hazarding of money. The evidence for the State, including an incriminatory statement made by the accused, authorized the jury to find her guilty of the offense charged. She introduced no evidence, but made a statement to the jury, denying her guilt, which was evidently rejected by the jury. Her petition for certiorari was based upon a ground that her conviction was not authorized by the evidence, and upon a ground excepting to the admission of certain evidence. However, the special ground is expressly abandoned in the brief of her counsel. The overruling of the certiorari was not error.

Judgment affirmed. MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bradley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 16, 1942
19 S.E.2d 796 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942)
Case details for

Bradley v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRADLEY v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 16, 1942

Citations

19 S.E.2d 796 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942)
19 S.E.2d 796