From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. Department of Housing Urban Development

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Feb 2, 2006
Case No. 1:04cv779 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 2, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:04cv779.

February 2, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed January 4, 2006 (Doc. 33).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. This action is closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bradley v. Department of Housing Urban Development

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Feb 2, 2006
Case No. 1:04cv779 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Bradley v. Department of Housing Urban Development

Case Details

Full title:William R. Bradley, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Department of Housing and Urban…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Feb 2, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:04cv779 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 2, 2006)