Bradley v. County of Sacramento Department of Human Assistance of Northern California Welfare Division

Full title: RUBY BRADLEY, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 25, 2015

2:13-cv-2420 TLN DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2015)

Opinion

RUBY BRADLEY, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN ASSISTANCE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WELFARE DIVISION, et al., Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-2420 TLN DAD PS United States District Court, E.D. California. August 25, 2015

          ORDER

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

         On July 22, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff has filed objection to the findings and recommendations.

         The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 22, 2015 (Dkt. No. 25) are adopted in full;

2. Defendant's November 21, 2014 amended motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 15) is granted;

         3. The amended complaint's race-based discrimination and hostile work environment causes of action are dismissed; and

         4. Defendant is directed to file an answer to the amended complaint's age-based discrimination claim within 14 days of the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations.