From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. Bradley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 31, 2012
95 A.D.3d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-31

Mariellen Lane BRADLEY, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Peter William BRADLEY, Defendant–Appellant.

Glenn S. Koopersmith, Garden City, for appellant. Chemtob Moss Forman & Talbert, LLP, New York (Michael F. Beyda of counsel), for respondent.


Glenn S. Koopersmith, Garden City, for appellant. Chemtob Moss Forman & Talbert, LLP, New York (Michael F. Beyda of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen Gesmer, J.), entered May 6, 2011, which granted plaintiff's motion to direct defendant to pay her $25,000 to enable her to retain counsel in an out-of-state non-matrimonial action and to pay any subsequent legal fees she incurs therein, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

In a matrimonial action, the court is not authorized to award counsel fees to either party for legal services rendered in a non-matrimonial action or proceeding, even where the two actions are related ( see e.g. Schapiro v. Schapiro, 204 A.D.2d 87, 612 N.Y.S.2d 6 [1994];Anonymous v. Anonymous, 258 A.D.2d 547, 685 N.Y.S.2d 294 [1999];Ravel v. Ravel, 235 A.D.2d 410, 652 N.Y.S.2d 306 [1997] ).

MAZZARELLI, J.P., CATTERSON, DeGRASSE, RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bradley v. Bradley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 31, 2012
95 A.D.3d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Bradley v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:Mariellen Lane BRADLEY, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Peter William BRADLEY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 31, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 4221
944 N.Y.S.2d 880

Citing Cases

N.B. v. J.M.

"In a matrimonial action, the court is not authorized to award counsel fees to either party for legal…

M v. M

”The Husband argues that the wife is not entitled to fees incurred in connection with this motion, citing…