From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. Bradley

Supreme Court of Nevada
Mar 15, 1979
95 Nev. 201 (Nev. 1979)

Opinion

No. 9703

March 15, 1979

Appeal from Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; John F. Mendoza, Judge.

Rickdall Shulman, Las Vegas, for Appellant.

Cromer, Barker Michaelson and Gerald I. Gillock, Las Vegas, for Respondent.


OPINION


Appellant claimed she was unaware that her husband's divorce action was proceeding as an uncontested hearing, although she was present at all pertinent conferences and sessions. She also complains that because of inadequate legal representation, the property division was inequitable.

The court has reviewed the proceedings, briefs and record and after hearing oral argument determines there is no merit to this appeal.

Present counsel did not represent the appellant in the court below.

Affirmed.

THE HON.E.M. GUNDERSON having voluntarily disqualified himself from participating in the decision of this appeal, the Chief Justice designated HON. DAVID ZENOFF, Senior Justice, to sit in his stead. Nev. Const. art. 6, § 19; SCR 243.


Summaries of

Bradley v. Bradley

Supreme Court of Nevada
Mar 15, 1979
95 Nev. 201 (Nev. 1979)
Case details for

Bradley v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:MELBA RUTH BRADLEY, APPELLANT, v. ROBERT Q. BRADLEY, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Mar 15, 1979

Citations

95 Nev. 201 (Nev. 1979)
591 P.2d 663

Citing Cases

Valley Health Sys. v. Murray

Indeed, the chief justice assigned a senior justice to participate in supreme court cases in place of a…

Trustees of Church of Universology v. State

This appeal followed. The court has reviewed the proceedings, briefs and record and after hearing oral…