From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brading v. Gilbert Central Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Apr 8, 2008
CASE NO. 3:05CV00242 JMM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 8, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:05CV00242 JMM.

April 8, 2008


ORDER


Pending before the Court is defendant's motion in limine which seeks to exclude any evidence of prior lawsuits or litigation involving defendant, and any evidence of other accidents that might have occurred in the same construction zone where plaintiff's accident occurred. In his response, plaintiff concedes that evidence of prior lawsuits or litigation involving defendant should not be admitted into evidence. However, plaintiff contends that he should be allowed to offer evidence of prior accidents that occurred in the same construction zone as his accident because such evidence is relevant and probative on the issue of notice.

Defendant's motion is granted in part and denied in part (#63). Plaintiff may not present evidence of prior lawsuits or litigation involving defendant. If plaintiff establishes at trial that notice is an issue, plaintiff may present proof of other similar accidents occurring in the same construction zone.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brading v. Gilbert Central Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Apr 8, 2008
CASE NO. 3:05CV00242 JMM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 8, 2008)
Case details for

Brading v. Gilbert Central Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JOE BRADING PLAINTIFF v. GILBERT CENTRAL CORPORATION DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division

Date published: Apr 8, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 3:05CV00242 JMM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 8, 2008)