From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradford v. Child Protective Servs. of Mich. Genesee Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 13, 2013
Case No. 12-cv-13718 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-cv-13718

08-13-2013

REGINA BRADFORD and SHANNON HANSEN, Plaintiffs, v. CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES OF MICHIGAN GENESEE COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (docket no. 13)

AND GRANTING GENESEE COUNTY CPS'S MOTION TO DISMISS (docket no. 9)

Plaintiffs Regina Bradford and Shannon Hansen filed their pro se civil rights complaint against Child Protective Services of Genesee County ("CPS"), CPS employees Janey Lamar and Katie Wiliby, and Flint police officers Terrance Walker and Mike West. Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants violated their Fourth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment rights while investigating allegations of child abuse. Genesee County CPS filed a motion to dismiss on December 14, 2012, arguing that as an arm of the State of Michigan, it is immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge who issued a report and recommendation ("Report") on June 25, 2013, suggesting that the Court grant CPS's motion to dismiss.

De novo review of a magistrate judge's findings is only required when a party has properly objected to the proposed findings and recommendations. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). A copy of the report and recommendation was served upon the Plaintiffs at their address of record, but they have failed to file any objection within the time provided. De novo review of the magistrate judge's findings is, therefore, not required.

The Court has reviewed the file and the report and recommendation, and finds that the magistrate judge's analysis is proper. Accordingly, it will adopt the report's findings and conclusions, and will grant CPS's motion to dismiss.

WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that magistrate judge's report and recommendation (docket no. 13) is ADOPTED and CPS's motion to dismiss (docket no. 9) is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.

___________

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

United States District Judge
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on August 13, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

___________

Case Manager


Summaries of

Bradford v. Child Protective Servs. of Mich. Genesee Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 13, 2013
Case No. 12-cv-13718 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Bradford v. Child Protective Servs. of Mich. Genesee Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:REGINA BRADFORD and SHANNON HANSEN, Plaintiffs, v. CHILD PROTECTIVE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 13, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-cv-13718 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2013)

Citing Cases

Brent v. Wayne Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs.

"In 1975, the Michigan legislature abolished county departments of social services, replacing them with a…