From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braddy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 8, 1989
536 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-1063.

December 21, 1988. Rehearing and Certification Denied February 8, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; Michael D. Miller, Judge.

Harrel F. Braddy, Belle Glade, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Cecilia Bradley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing. The appellant has made a prima facie showing, supported by his own sworn statements, that he was not afforded notice of the disciplinary proceedings conducted against him. The resolution of his claim requires an evidentiary hearing. See Moore v. Wainwright, 366 So.2d 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Of course, these proceedings would be mooted if the appellee decided to afford the appellant a new administrative hearing with proper notice given to appellant.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Braddy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 8, 1989
536 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Braddy v. State

Case Details

Full title:HARREL F. BRADDY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 8, 1989

Citations

536 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)