From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradbury v. Loman

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 19, 2024
24-cv-01886-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-01886-WHO (PR)

06-19-2024

BRIAN G. BRADBURY, Plaintiff, v. LOMAN, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

When plaintiff Brian G. Bradbury failed to comply with the Clerk's Notice to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) or pay the $402.00 filing fee by the Clerk's deadline, I ordered him to comply with the Clerk's Notice by June 3, 2024. (Order, Dkt. No. 6.) He has not done so, nor has he filed any response to my Order. Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with my Order.

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Bradbury may file a motion to reopen. Any such motion must contain (i) full payment for the $402.00 filing fee; or (ii) a complete IFP application.

The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bradbury v. Loman

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 19, 2024
24-cv-01886-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Bradbury v. Loman

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN G. BRADBURY, Plaintiff, v. LOMAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 19, 2024

Citations

24-cv-01886-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2024)