From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bracey v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 30, 2021
1:20-cv-06768-MKV (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-06768-MKV

08-30-2021

JAMAHL BRACEY, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, POLICE OFFICER JONATHAN RUIZ, SERGEANT THOMPSON, and ONE OTHER UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICER, Defendants.


ORDER

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge.

A review of Court records indicates that the Amended Complaint in this action was filed on February 11, 2021 [ECF Nos. 21-22], and that no proof of service of the summons and Amended Complaint has been filed. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides:

If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court - on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff - must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.

Plaintiff is directed to serve the summons and Complaint on Defendants on or before September 30, 2021. If service has not been made on or before September 30, 2021, and if Plaintiff fails to show cause, in writing, why service has not been made, the Amended Complaint will be dismissed for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4 and 41.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bracey v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 30, 2021
1:20-cv-06768-MKV (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Bracey v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JAMAHL BRACEY, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, POLICE OFFICER JONATHAN…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 30, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-06768-MKV (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2021)