From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boykins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Feb 16, 2021
623 S.W.3d 612 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. ED 108438

02-16-2021

Timothy BOYKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Susan A. Degorge, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Mo. 63101, for appellant. Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Mo. 65102, for respondent.


Susan A. Degorge, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Mo. 63101, for appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Mo. 65102, for respondent.

Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J.; Kurt S. Odenwald, J.; and James M. Dowd, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM Timothy Boykins appeals the circuit court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).


Summaries of

Boykins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Feb 16, 2021
623 S.W.3d 612 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Boykins v. State

Case Details

Full title:Timothy BOYKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Feb 16, 2021

Citations

623 S.W.3d 612 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021)