From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyington v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Sep 28, 2022
No. 1D22-1497 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 28, 2022)

Opinion

1D22-1497

09-28-2022

Michael Boyington, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Michael Boyington, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus-Original Jurisdiction.

Michael Boyington, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Because the trial court has ruled on the pleading pending below, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State, 770 So.2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (dismissing a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the pleading pending below).

Lewis, Makar, and Jay, JJ., concur. 1


Summaries of

Boyington v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Sep 28, 2022
No. 1D22-1497 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Boyington v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael Boyington, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Sep 28, 2022

Citations

No. 1D22-1497 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 28, 2022)