Boyd v. State

Full title: James Boyd, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE .

Date published: Mar 10, 2015

466 S.W.3d 565 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

ED 101257

03-10-2015

James Boyd, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Amy E. Lowe, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant. Chris Koster, Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

PER CURIAM

Amy E. Lowe, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Chris Koster, Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

James Boyd appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2014).